verification
⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8d — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-24]
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8d: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
verification
⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-21]
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 250K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-17]
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-14]
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 235K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-10]
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
❌ Verification: Not specified (ceramic material) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-07]
We tested Not specified (ceramic material): paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 18K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
❌ Verification: ceramic (unspecified composition) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-07-03]
We tested ceramic (unspecified composition): paper claims 151 Kelvin, our simulation predicts 23K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: lanthanum decahydride — Paper vs Simulation [2026-06-30]
We tested lanthanum decahydride: paper claims 250 K, our simulation predicts 188K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-06-26]
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 250K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-06-23]
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 250K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-06-19]
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 250K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
❌ Verification: Unknown material (not specified) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-06-16]
We tested Unknown material (not specified): paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 38K. Here's what the gap tells us.