verification

verification

❌ Verification: ceramic (unspecified composition) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-29]

We tested ceramic (unspecified composition): paper claims 151 Kelvin, our simulation predicts 23K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

✅ Verification: H3S — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-26]

We tested H3S: paper claims above 200K, our simulation predicts 203K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: LaH₁₀ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-22]

We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 220K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: Li2MgH16 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-19]

We tested Li2MgH16: paper claims 473 K, our simulation predicts 180K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

✅ Verification: calcium superhydrides — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-15]

We tested calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210K–215K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

✅ Verification: calcium superhydrides — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-12]

We tested calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210–215 K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

🔬 Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-08]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

✅ Verification: Calcium superhydrides — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-05]

We tested Calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210–215 K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: Li2MgH16 (dilithium magnesium hexadecahydride) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-01]

We tested Li2MgH16 (dilithium magnesium hexadecahydride): paper claims 473 K (200 °C), our simulation predicts 180K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

✅ Verification: calcium superhydrides — Paper vs Simulation [2026-04-28]

We tested calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210K–215K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: calcium superhydride — Paper vs Simulation [2026-04-24]

We tested calcium superhydride: paper claims 200 K, our simulation predicts 183K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: KB3C3 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-04-21]

We tested KB3C3: paper claims 102.5 K, our simulation predicts 18K. Here's what the gap tells us.