verification
🔬 Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-05-08]
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210–215 K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Li2MgH16 (dilithium magnesium hexadecahydride): paper claims 473 K (200 °C), our simulation predicts 180K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested calcium superhydrides: paper claims above 210 K, our simulation predicts 210K–215K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested calcium superhydride: paper claims 200 K, our simulation predicts 183K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested KB3C3: paper claims 102.5 K, our simulation predicts 18K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested calcium polyhydrides: paper claims above 210K, our simulation predicts 185K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Hydrogen-rich hydrides: paper claims above 550K, our simulation predicts 23K. Here's what the gap tells us.