verification
⚠️ Verification: (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-08-21]
We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims above 40 K, our simulation predicts ~30K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims above 40 K, our simulation predicts ~30K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Unknown (UH team material not specified): paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 35K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Unknown (University of Houston team - mercury-based copper-oxide ceramic): paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Unknown mercury-based copper-oxide ceramic or similar material: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Unknown mercury-based material (UH team discovery): paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 45K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested Hg1223: paper claims 18 degrees higher than previously measured, our simulation predicts 138K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims 40 K, our simulation predicts Unknown. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims above 40 K, our simulation predicts 8K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8d: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 250K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.
verification
We tested LaH₁₀: paper claims 260K, our simulation predicts 235K. Here's what the gap tells us.