verification

verification

✅ Verification: LaH10 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-23]

We tested LaH10: paper claims 250K, our simulation predicts 250-260K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: titanium — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-20]

We tested titanium: paper claims above 20 K, our simulation predicts 25K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-16]

We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims 40 K, our simulation predicts 20K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: Nb3Si — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-09]

We tested Nb3Si: paper claims Not explicitly stated in excerpt, our simulation predicts ~2-5K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-06]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 135K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-10-02]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 135K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-29]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 135K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: Hg-1223 (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ) — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-25]

We tested Hg-1223 (HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ): paper claims 151K, our simulation predicts 134K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-22]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 135K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

⚠️ Verification: HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-18]

We tested HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ: paper claims 151 K, our simulation predicts 135K. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-15]

We tested (La,Pr)3Ni2O7: paper claims above 40 K, our simulation predicts ~0-15K at ambient (likely non-superconducting); ~80K only under pressure. Here's what the gap tells us.

verification

❌ Verification: LK-99 — Paper vs Simulation [2026-09-11]

We tested LK-99: paper claims room temperature, our simulation predicts ~0K (no bulk superconductivity). Here's what the gap tells us.